FROM: double_entendre@hotmail.com SUBJECT: Moose Petersen warm polarizer DATE: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 23:12:32 GMT ORGANIZATION: Deja.com - Before you buy. NEWSGROUPS: rec.photo.equipment.35mm Any thoughts on that filter? Anyone used it? I'm thinking of getting both 81a and 81b filters in addition to a circular polarizer and don't know if that lens is a good investment. At the price of 77mm filters, I'm in no hurry to buy more than I need to. Thanks as always! Bob Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy. FROM: nighttrain@earthlink.net (David Greenfield) SUBJECT: Re: Moose Petersen warm polarizer DATE: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 03:02:39 GMT ORGANIZATION: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net NEWSGROUPS: rec.photo.equipment.35mm Roy wrote: > If you have a need for polarizer and warming filter simultaneously this > seems to be the best way to go. The "best" way? Not necessarily. B&W and Heliopan have long made warming polarizers, which I would trust more than a "Moose" filter made by Kenko (I believe). FROM: "Roy" SUBJECT: Re: Moose Petersen warm polarizer DATE: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 15:18:20 GMT ORGANIZATION: FlashNet Communications, http://www.flash.net NEWSGROUPS: rec.photo.equipment.35mm "David Greenfield" wrote in message news:1ehdukr.kk6afc13n910yN%nighttrain@earthlink.net... > Roy wrote: > > > If you have a need for polarizer and warming filter simultaneously this > > seems to be the best way to go. > > The "best" way? Not necessarily. > > B&W and Heliopan have long made warming polarizers, which I would trust > more than a "Moose" filter made by Kenko (I believe). The Moose filter is actually made by Hoya. Sorry about any confusion. My statement wasn't meant to imply that the Moose filter was the best one. The intended statement is that a warming polarizer is the best way to get the effect compared to stacking two filters. Roy http://bresfam.tripod.com